PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZO vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AZO vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZO achieves a -9.79% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 9.06% return. Over the past 10 years, AZO has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 15.16%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.86% annualized return.


AZO

1D
-2.18%
1M
-9.09%
YTD
-9.79%
6M
-9.83%
1Y
-15.12%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
17.16%
10Y*
15.16%

AAPL

1D
-1.10%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
9.06%
6M
9.07%
1Y
51.87%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
18.40%
10Y*
29.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZO vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
-9.79%5.92%23.84%4.84%17.64%76.84%-0.49%42.10%17.85%-9.93%
AAPL
Apple Inc
9.06%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AZO and AAPL is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1991

0.21

The correlation between AZO and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AZO:

$51.56B

AAPL:

$4.37T

EPS

AZO:

$145.27

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

AZO:

21.06

AAPL:

35.93

PEG Ratio

AZO:

1.82

AAPL:

4.73

PS Ratio

AZO:

2.61

AAPL:

9.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

AZO:

$19.99B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AZO:

$10.34B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

AZO:

$4.26B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZO vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZO
AZO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
AZO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
AZO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZO vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AZOAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.41

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

3.78

-4.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

9.35

-10.31

AZO vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZO Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZO and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AZO vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZO drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZO and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZOAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.32%

-81.80%

+35.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.59%

-13.80%

-18.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.59%

-33.36%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-33.36%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.14%

-38.52%

-3.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.74%

-6.11%

-23.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.89%

-29.59%

+18.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.81%

5.57%

+10.24%

Volatility

AZO vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 7.07%. This indicates that AZO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZOAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.60%

7.07%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.77%

16.61%

+5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.28%

22.68%

+4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

27.52%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.49%

28.92%

-2.43%

Dividends

AZO vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

AZO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AZO vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AutoZone, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
4.84B
111.18B
(AZO) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AZO vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AutoZone, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%52.0%54.0%20222023202420252026
52.2%
49.3%
Portfolio components
AZO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

AZO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 923.76M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

AZO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 641.49M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AZO and AAPL have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AZO has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to AAPL (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZO dropped -46.32% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZO and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer