AZBIX vs. LSSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX).
AZBIX is managed by Allianz. It was launched on Jul 1, 2013. LSSCX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 13, 1991.
Performance
AZBIX vs. LSSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AZBIX vs. LSSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZBIX Virtus Small-Cap Fund | -0.89% | 8.49% | 19.06% | 14.09% | -18.04% | 18.92% | 16.98% | 24.13% | -9.25% | 21.27% |
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 0.75% | 5.31% | 10.89% | 19.39% | -11.52% | 29.03% | 2.29% | 25.06% | -16.81% | 10.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZBIX achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than LSSCX's 0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AZBIX has outperformed LSSCX with an annualized return of 10.25%, while LSSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.71% annualized return.
AZBIX
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -2.42%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
LSSCX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AZBIX vs. LSSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AZBIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than LSSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AZBIX vs. LSSCX — Risk / Return Rank
AZBIX
LSSCX
AZBIX vs. LSSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZBIX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.57 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 0.98 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.13 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 0.08 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 0.25 | +4.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZBIX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.57 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.32 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.40 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.56 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between AZBIX and LSSCX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AZBIX vs. LSSCX - Dividend Comparison
AZBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than LSSCX's 17.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZBIX Virtus Small-Cap Fund | 4.94% | 4.90% | 10.82% | 2.31% | 4.78% | 13.82% | 0.45% | 0.38% | 9.62% | 13.80% | 0.03% | 3.59% |
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 17.37% | 17.50% | 10.71% | 20.30% | 12.74% | 19.01% | 8.04% | 8.65% | 17.43% | 12.58% | 8.27% | 11.35% |
Drawdowns
AZBIX vs. LSSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZBIX drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, smaller than the maximum LSSCX drawdown of -54.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZBIX and LSSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZBIX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.80% | -54.28% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -14.43% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.85% | -25.10% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.80% | -44.65% | +3.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.46% | -9.89% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -7.61% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 6.62% | -3.44% |
Volatility
AZBIX vs. LSSCX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) at 4.56%. This indicates that AZBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AZBIX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 4.56% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 12.70% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 24.85% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 20.90% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 22.37% | -1.08% |