PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AXSM vs. COCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AXSM vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. (AXSM) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AXSM achieves a 19.36% return, which is significantly lower than COCO's 24.39% return.


AXSM

1D
-7.10%
1M
-9.42%
6M
18.31%
YTD
19.36%
1Y
115.02%
3Y*
41.26%
5Y*
35.01%
10Y*
39.83%
ALL TIME*
34.71%

COCO

1D
-1.51%
1M
-4.41%
6M
23.60%
YTD
24.39%
1Y
87.01%
3Y*
35.70%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$153.10M$171.36M$209.26M
$95.25M$85.05M$87.09M

AXSM vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AXSM
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
19.36%115.86%6.31%3.19%104.16%-9.85%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
24.39%43.62%43.90%85.60%23.72%-27.33%

Correlation

The correlation between AXSM and COCO is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.16

The correlation between AXSM and COCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AXSM:

$11.22B

COCO:

$3.77B

EPS

AXSM:

-$3.72

COCO:

$1.82

PS Ratio

AXSM:

15.58

COCO:

5.63

PB Ratio

AXSM:

204.46

COCO:

9.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

AXSM:

$708.24M

COCO:

$706.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AXSM:

$655.82M

COCO:

$289.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

AXSM:

-$172.72M

COCO:

$143.38M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AXSM vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AXSM
AXSM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AXSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AXSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXSM Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

COCO
COCO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AXSM vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. (AXSM) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AXSMCOCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.25

3.77

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.02

9.72

+8.30

AXSM vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AXSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AXSM and COCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AXSM vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXSM drawdown since its inception was -86.65%, which is greater than COCO's maximum drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXSM and COCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AXSMCOCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.65%

-56.97%

-29.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.50%

-23.23%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.69%

-38.55%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.57%

-21.52%

+6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.06%

-16.70%

-22.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

9.02%

-2.61%

Volatility

AXSM vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. (AXSM) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) have volatilities of 14.94% and 14.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AXSMCOCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.94%

14.30%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.72%

45.30%

-16.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.96%

55.50%

-12.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.11%

56.79%

+13.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.38%

56.79%

+33.59%

Dividends

AXSM vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AXSM nor COCO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AXSM vs. COCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

AXSM vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

AXSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 176.48M and revenue of 191.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.3%.

COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 105.31M and revenue of 216.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

AXSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. reported an operating income of -63.36M and revenue of 191.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -33.1%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 63.14M and revenue of 216.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.2%.

AXSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. reported a net income of -64.54M and revenue of 191.20M, resulting in a net margin of -33.8%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 49.45M and revenue of 216.15M, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AXSM and COCO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AXSM has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to COCO (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AXSM dropped -86.65% vs COCO's -56.97%.

AXSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AXSM and COCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer