AXPG vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AXPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - AXPG tracks the American Express Company (AXP) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AXPG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

AXPG vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AXPG

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 14.98%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLD

• 1D: -6.61%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 29.58%
• 6M: 26.13%
• 1Y: 66.80%
• 3Y*: 43.61%
• 5Y*: 21.41%
• 10Y*: 36.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXPG vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AXPG Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF	-9.95%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	34.67%

Correlation

The correlation between AXPG and QLD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.35

Return for Risk

AXPG vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AXPG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 53
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AXPG vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AXPG	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.88	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.33	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.05	—

Drawdowns

AXPG vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXPG drawdown since its inception was -30.54%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXPG and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AXPG	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.54%	-83.13%	+52.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.38%	-9.26%	-2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.11%	-18.14%	-1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AXPG	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.60%	35.77%	+23.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.60%	45.34%	+14.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.60%	44.80%	+14.80%

AXPG vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AXPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AXPG vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

AXPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AXPG Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AXPG and QLD in my portfolio?

AXPG and QLD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AXPG or QLD?

On fees, AXPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AXPG or QLD?

AXPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AXPG or QLD?

QLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for AXPG.

What is the main difference between AXPG and QLD?

AXPG tracks American Express Company (AXP), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AXPG and 0.95% for QLD.