AWSAX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
AWSAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Dec 28, 2000. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWSAX Invesco Global Core Equity Fund | -6.43% | 15.33% | 16.49% | 21.79% | -22.22% | 15.71% | 7.29% | 24.54% | -15.01% | 22.83% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWSAX achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, AWSAX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
AWSAX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -9.47%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -5.55%
- 1Y
- 10.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWSAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AWSAX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
AWSAX
FGIAX
AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWSAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.75 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 2.26 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 2.61 | -1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 12.12 | -8.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWSAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.75 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.80 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.58 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.42 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between AWSAX and FGIAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
AWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.88%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWSAX Invesco Global Core Equity Fund | 9.88% | 9.24% | 8.01% | 2.48% | 3.26% | 5.38% | 15.26% | 1.21% | 8.57% | 5.24% | 0.35% | 1.22% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWSAX drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWSAX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWSAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.00% | -49.35% | -7.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -8.29% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.23% | -21.08% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.12% | -38.02% | +1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.11% | -3.78% | -6.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -7.22% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.78% | +0.80% |
Volatility
AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that AWSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AWSAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 4.05% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 7.09% | +2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 12.28% | +4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 13.08% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 15.17% | +1.93% |