PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWSAX vs. FGIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWSAX achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AWSAX having a 8.50% annualized return and FGIAX not far behind at 8.40%.


AWSAX

1D
0.11%
1M
2.51%
YTD
7.53%
6M
7.81%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
8.50%

FGIAX

1D
1.44%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
9.87%
6M
9.57%
1Y
14.70%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWSAX
Invesco Global Core Equity Fund
7.53%15.33%16.49%21.79%-22.22%15.71%7.29%24.54%-15.01%22.83%
FGIAX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
9.87%17.73%10.70%8.51%-6.23%14.51%-2.76%29.32%-7.91%19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AWSAX and FGIAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2007

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between AWSAX and FGIAX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWSAX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWSAX
AWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
AWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FGIAX
FGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AWSAXFGIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.39

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

8.11

-0.40

AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the FGIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWSAX and FGIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AWSAXFGIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.39

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.70

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.55

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.41

-0.07

Drawdowns

AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWSAX drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWSAX and FGIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWSAXFGIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.00%

-49.35%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-6.04%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.74%

-12.45%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.23%

-21.08%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

-38.02%

+1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-4.05%

+3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-7.17%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

1.78%

+0.58%

Volatility

AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX) is 3.48%, while Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that AWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWSAXFGIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.88%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

8.65%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

10.42%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

13.24%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

15.23%

+1.91%

AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWSAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWSAX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison

AWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, less than FGIAX's 14.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWSAX
Invesco Global Core Equity Fund
8.60%9.24%8.01%2.48%3.26%5.38%15.26%1.21%8.57%5.24%0.35%1.22%
FGIAX
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
14.52%9.99%7.46%2.27%6.11%7.20%1.38%7.06%6.32%5.83%8.23%3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


AWSAX and FGIAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGIAX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to AWSAX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWSAX dropped -57.00% vs FGIAX's -49.35%.

AWSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWSAX and FGIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer