AWF vs. PRFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX).
AWF is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 28, 1993. PRFRX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 29, 2011.
Performance
AWF vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AWF vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | -3.52% | 7.54% | 14.30% | 18.37% | -16.62% | 9.95% | 4.40% | 23.40% | -11.35% | 7.77% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | -0.06% | 13.09% | 8.80% | 13.78% | -1.95% | 4.60% | 1.75% | 8.46% | -0.08% | 3.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWF achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than PRFRX's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, AWF has outperformed PRFRX with an annualized return of 6.15%, while PRFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.66% annualized return.
AWF
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -5.90%
- 1Y
- 1.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
PRFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- 11.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AWF vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWF has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PRFRX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AWF vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank
AWF
PRFRX
AWF vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWF | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | 3.66 | -3.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.29 | 7.34 | -7.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 2.39 | -1.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 5.81 | -5.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | 28.10 | -27.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWF | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 3.66 | -3.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 2.48 | -2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 1.45 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.43 | -1.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between AWF and PRFRX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AWF vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison
AWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, less than PRFRX's 12.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | 7.73% | 7.81% | 7.47% | 7.33% | 10.30% | 6.48% | 6.68% | 6.62% | 7.97% | 6.03% | 7.73% | 10.28% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | 12.94% | 12.91% | 8.17% | 9.57% | 4.03% | 3.86% | 4.00% | 4.84% | 4.87% | 4.04% | 4.07% | 4.07% |
Drawdowns
AWF vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWF drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than PRFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWF and PRFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWF | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -20.05% | -35.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -2.07% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -5.94% | -19.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.12% | -20.05% | -20.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -0.64% | -6.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -0.69% | -11.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 0.43% | +3.42% |
Volatility
AWF vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) at 0.74%. This indicates that AWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AWF | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 0.74% | +3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.85% | 2.18% | +3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.30% | 3.34% | +7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 2.91% | +9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 3.92% | +11.24% |