AWF vs. SVOL
AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) and SVOL (Simplify Volatility Premium ETF) are both funds - AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while SVOL is a Volatility fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AWF returned 3.85%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for SVOL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AWF charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SVOL.
Performance
AWF vs. SVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWF achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than SVOL's 2.12% return.
AWF
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- -1.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.85%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
SVOL
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
AWF vs. SVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | -1.22% | 7.54% | 14.30% | 18.37% | -16.62% | 6.78% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | 2.12% | 2.41% | 6.77% | 22.88% | -3.30% | 12.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWF and SVOL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWF vs. SVOL — Risk / Return Rank
AWF
SVOL
AWF vs. SVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWF | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.15 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 1.13 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 3.25 | -3.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWF vs. SVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWF drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than SVOL's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWF and SVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWF | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -33.50% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -11.42% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.12% | -33.50% | +22.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -33.50% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.34% | -0.52% | -4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -4.72% | -7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 3.97% | +0.64% |
Volatility
AWF vs. SVOL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) is 2.12%, while Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that AWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWF | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 3.89% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | 10.39% | -2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.87% | 17.35% | -8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 22.02% | -9.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 21.80% | -6.62% |
AWF vs. SVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWF has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SVOL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWF vs. SVOL - Dividend Comparison
AWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, less than SVOL's 21.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | 7.74% | 7.81% | 7.47% | 7.33% | 10.30% | 6.48% | 6.68% | 6.62% | 7.97% | 6.03% | 7.73% | 10.28% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | 21.81% | 19.82% | 16.79% | 16.36% | 18.32% | 4.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWF and SVOL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVOL has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to AWF (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWF dropped -55.54% vs SVOL's -33.50%.
SVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWF and SVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer