AWF vs. BUCK
AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both funds - AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AWF returned 8.40%/yr vs 5.15%/yr for BUCK. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AWF charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
AWF vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWF achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 2.42% return.
AWF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 1Y
- -2.40%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.25%
BUCK
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 5.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.00M | $3.41M | $3.90M | |
| $3.71M | $3.63M | $3.94M |
AWF vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | -1.80% | 7.54% | 14.30% | 18.37% | 0.64% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 2.42% | 4.13% | 7.25% | 4.63% | 0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWF and BUCK is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWF vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
AWF
BUCK
AWF vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWF | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.52 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 7.39 | -7.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 34.83 | -35.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWF vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWF drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWF and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWF | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -5.43% | -50.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -0.84% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.12% | -5.43% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -0.11% | -5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -0.47% | -11.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 0.18% | +4.62% |
Volatility
AWF vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.39%. This indicates that AWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWF | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 0.39% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 1.24% | +6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.45% | 2.59% | +5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.09% | 3.42% | +8.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 3.42% | +11.75% |
AWF vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWF has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWF vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
AWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, more than BUCK's 7.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | 7.79% | 7.81% | 7.47% | 7.33% | 10.30% | 6.48% | 6.68% | 6.62% | 7.97% | 6.03% | 7.73% | 10.28% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.20% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWF and BUCK have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWF has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to BUCK (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWF dropped -55.54% vs BUCK's -5.43%.
BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWF and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer