PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWF vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AWF vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AWF vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AWF
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund
-3.52%7.54%14.30%18.37%-0.42%
BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
0.97%4.13%7.25%4.63%0.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWF achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 0.97% return.


AWF

1D
2.94%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-5.90%
1Y
1.90%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
6.15%

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.97%
6M
2.27%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AWF vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWF has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AWF vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWF
AWF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWF vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AWFBUCKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.17

0.55

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.29

0.72

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.12

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.51

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.52

1.35

-0.83

AWF vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWF Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWF and BUCK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AWFBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

0.55

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.44

-1.13

Correlation

The correlation between AWF and BUCK is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AWF vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

AWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than BUCK's 7.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWF
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund
7.73%7.81%7.47%7.33%10.30%6.48%6.68%6.62%7.97%6.03%7.73%10.28%
BUCK
Simplify Stable Income ETF
7.57%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AWF vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWF drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWF and BUCK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AWFBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-5.43%

-50.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-5.43%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-0.13%

-7.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-0.52%

-11.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.04%

+1.81%

Volatility

AWF vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Simplify Stable Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.33%. This indicates that AWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AWFBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

0.33%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.85%

1.68%

+4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

4.83%

+6.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.98%

3.55%

+8.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

3.55%

+11.61%