AWF vs. AUNYX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) and AUNYX (AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy) are both mutual funds - AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while AUNYX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, AWF returned 5.40%/yr vs 3.11%/yr for AUNYX. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AWF charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for AUNYX.

Performance

AWF vs. AUNYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWF achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than AUNYX's 1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, AWF has outperformed AUNYX with an annualized return of 5.40%, while AUNYX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.11% annualized return.

AWF

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: -1.56%
• YTD: -1.31%
• 1Y: -1.92%
• 3Y*: 8.78%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 5.40%
• ALL TIME*: 6.27%

AUNYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.89%
• 6M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 3.70%
• 5Y*: 2.18%
• 10Y*: 3.11%
• ALL TIME*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AUNYX AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	$2.79M	$3.34M	$3.76M

AWF vs. AUNYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-1.31%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-16.62%	9.95%	4.40%	23.40%	-11.35%	7.77%
AUNYX AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy	1.63%	5.19%	2.36%	5.17%	-4.84%	7.30%	4.58%	6.74%	-0.07%	3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AWF and AUNYX is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2010	0.13

Return for Risk

AWF vs. AUNYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 2
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 2
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

AUNYX

AUNYX Risk / Return Rank: 85
AUNYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AUNYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AUNYX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AUNYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
AUNYX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AWF vs. AUNYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AWF	AUNYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	2.21	-2.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	3.17	-3.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.47	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	2.79	-2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.40	10.31	-10.71

AWF vs. AUNYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWF Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the AUNYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWF and AUNYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AWF vs. AUNYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWF drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than AUNYX's maximum drawdown of -14.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWF and AUNYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWF	AUNYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.54%	-14.10%	-41.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-1.74%	-8.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.12%	-3.53%	-7.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.25%	-8.44%	-16.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.12%	-14.10%	-26.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.43%	-1.30%	-4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-1.37%	-10.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.81%	0.47%	+4.34%

Volatility

AWF vs. AUNYX - Volatility Comparison

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) at 0.71%. This indicates that AWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUNYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWF	AUNYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	0.71%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.47%	1.81%	+5.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.48%	2.20%	+6.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.09%	3.41%	+8.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	3.59%	+11.59%

AWF vs. AUNYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWF has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AUNYX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AWF vs. AUNYX - Dividend Comparison

AWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than AUNYX's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUNYX AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy	3.06%	3.26%	2.53%	2.44%	1.64%	1.66%	2.37%	2.86%	2.64%	2.13%	2.01%	1.90%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	7.75%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AWF and AUNYX in my portfolio?

AWF and AUNYX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AWF or AUNYX?

AWF has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to AUNYX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWF dropped -55.54% vs AUNYX's -14.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUNYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.