PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUNYX vs. ACGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUNYX vs. ACGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUNYX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than ACGYX's -0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, AUNYX has outperformed ACGYX with an annualized return of 3.09%, while ACGYX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.87% annualized return.


AUNYX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.89%
6M
0.51%
YTD
1.63%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
3.09%
ALL TIME*
2.70%

ACGYX

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.96%
YTD
-0.55%
1Y
1.95%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
-0.63%
10Y*
1.87%
ALL TIME*
2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AUNYX vs. ACGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AUNYX
AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy
1.63%5.19%2.36%5.17%-4.84%7.30%4.58%6.74%-0.07%3.36%
ACGYX
AB Income Fund
-0.55%7.86%2.07%6.16%-15.45%-1.30%6.88%11.25%-1.21%6.33%

Correlation

The correlation between AUNYX and ACGYX is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016

0.12

The correlation between AUNYX and ACGYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUNYX vs. ACGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AUNYX
AUNYX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AUNYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUNYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUNYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AUNYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUNYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ACGYX
ACGYX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ACGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ACGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AUNYX vs. ACGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AUNYXACGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.14

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

1.00

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.26

2.74

+7.52

AUNYX vs. ACGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUNYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the ACGYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUNYX and ACGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AUNYX vs. ACGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUNYX drawdown since its inception was -14.10%, smaller than the maximum ACGYX drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUNYX and ACGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUNYXACGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.10%

-21.58%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.74%

-3.36%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.53%

-5.82%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.44%

-21.52%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.10%

-21.58%

+7.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-3.33%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-5.36%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

1.22%

-0.76%

Volatility

AUNYX vs. ACGYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) is 0.71%, while AB Income Fund (ACGYX) has a volatility of 1.18%. This indicates that AUNYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUNYXACGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

1.18%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

3.56%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20%

4.37%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.41%

6.52%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

5.48%

-1.89%

AUNYX vs. ACGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUNYX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ACGYX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUNYX vs. ACGYX - Dividend Comparison

AUNYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than ACGYX's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACGYX
AB Income Fund
4.55%5.02%5.38%4.04%3.99%2.95%3.80%4.50%4.54%5.84%3.23%0.00%
AUNYX
AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy
3.06%3.26%2.53%2.44%1.64%1.66%2.37%2.86%2.64%2.13%2.01%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUNYX and ACGYX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACGYX has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to AUNYX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUNYX dropped -14.10% vs ACGYX's -21.58%.

AUNYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUNYX and ACGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer