AUNYX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
AUNYX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jan 25, 2010. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
AUNYX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUNYX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUNYX AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy | 0.48% | 5.19% | 2.36% | 5.17% | -4.84% | 7.30% | 4.58% | 6.74% | -0.07% | 3.36% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUNYX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, AUNYX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 3.00%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
AUNYX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUNYX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUNYX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AUNYX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
AUNYX
SCHG
AUNYX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUNYX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.76 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.24 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.17 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.09 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 3.71 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUNYX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.76 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.57 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.79 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.79 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUNYX and SCHG is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AUNYX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
AUNYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUNYX AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy | 3.29% | 3.26% | 2.53% | 2.44% | 1.64% | 1.66% | 2.37% | 2.86% | 2.64% | 2.13% | 2.01% | 1.90% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
AUNYX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUNYX drawdown since its inception was -14.10%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUNYX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUNYX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.10% | -34.59% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.33% | -16.41% | +13.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.44% | -34.59% | +26.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.10% | -34.59% | +20.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -12.51% | +11.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -5.22% | +3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 4.84% | -4.03% |
Volatility
AUNYX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) is 1.10%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that AUNYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUNYX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 6.77% | -5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | 12.54% | -11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23% | 22.45% | -19.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.40% | 22.31% | -18.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 21.51% | -17.93% |