AWAY vs. TMH
AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index while TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. AWAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.
Performance
AWAY vs. TMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AWAY
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -16.40%
- 6M
- -17.29%
- 1Y
- -18.42%
- 3Y*
- 0.30%
- 5Y*
- -11.20%
- 10Y*
- —
TMH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AWAY vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 1.55% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWAY and TMH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWAY vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank
AWAY
TMH
AWAY vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWAY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWAY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | -5.39 | +5.22 |
Drawdowns
AWAY vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and TMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWAY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -5.59% | -50.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.57% | -5.59% | -43.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.15% | -4.22% | -31.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.33% | — | — |
Volatility
AWAY vs. TMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWAY | TMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.36% | 20.85% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 20.85% | +5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.81% | 20.85% | +10.96% |
AWAY vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWAY vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison
Neither AWAY nor TMH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWAY and TMH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.
AWAY and TMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index, while TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AWAY and 0.19% for TMH.
Find the right allocation for AWAY and TMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer