AVXC vs. XC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVXC (Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF) and XC (WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - AVXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets IMI while XC tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AVXC returned 62.37% vs 8.33% for XC. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVXC charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for XC.

Performance

AVXC vs. XC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVXC achieves a 34.06% return, which is significantly higher than XC's -3.47% return.

AVXC

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 10.62%
• YTD: 34.06%
• 6M: 38.17%
• 1Y: 62.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XC

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: -3.47%
• 6M: -2.10%
• 1Y: 8.33%
• 3Y*: 9.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVXC vs. XC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	34.06%	31.45%	-0.80%
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	-3.47%	18.19%	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and XC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024	0.89

The correlation between AVXC and XC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVXC vs. XC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVXC	XC
Technology	38.2%	1.2%
Financial Services	20.2%	13.8%
Industrials	10.0%	4.7%
Basic Materials	8.1%	7.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	6.8%
Energy	4.9%	1.6%
Communication Services	3.7%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	4.9%
Utilities	2.8%	1.3%
Healthcare	2.3%	0.7%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.3%

Return for Risk

AVXC vs. XC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVXC

AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 87
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

XC

XC Risk / Return Rank: 18
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVXC vs. XC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVXC	XC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.12	0.57	+2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	0.91	+3.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.11	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.47	0.67	+3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.06	1.94	+16.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVXC vs. XC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the XC Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and XC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVXC	XC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.12	0.57	+2.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.58	0.71	+0.87

Drawdowns

AVXC vs. XC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, roughly equal to the maximum XC drawdown of -20.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and XC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVXC	XC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.44%	-20.97%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.04%	-12.47%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-9.35%	+7.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-4.12%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	4.29%	-0.83%

Volatility

AVXC vs. XC - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) at 5.00%. This indicates that AVXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVXC	XC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.00%	5.00%	+4.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.67%	12.60%	+5.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.07%	14.78%	+5.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.47%	15.87%	+2.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.47%	15.87%	+2.60%

AVXC vs. XC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XC's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVXC vs. XC - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than XC's 12.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	1.49%	1.97%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	12.41%	11.74%	1.49%	1.42%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVXC and XC in my portfolio?

AVXC and XC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVXC or XC?

AVXC has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to XC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs XC's -20.97%.

Which ETF is better, AVXC or XC?

On 1-year performance, AVXC leads with 62.37% vs 8.33% for XC. On fees, XC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, XC has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVXC or XC?

Over the 1-year period, AVXC has performed better with a 62.37% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVXC or XC?

XC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVXC or XC?

XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.41%, compared with 1.49% for AVXC.

What is the main difference between AVXC and XC?

AVXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets IMI, while XC tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Avantis Investors and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVXC and 0.32% for XC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.