PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAADX vs. AVEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DAADX vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DAADX vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DAADX
DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio
3.12%27.59%3.44%24.58%-15.81%0.20%
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.70%34.48%7.49%15.30%-18.15%-2.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAADX achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 4.70% return.


DAADX

1D
-1.26%
1M
-12.78%
YTD
3.12%
6M
10.78%
1Y
34.55%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
10Y*

AVEM

1D
3.60%
1M
-9.09%
YTD
4.70%
6M
9.02%
1Y
37.57%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAADX vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAADX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DAADX vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAADX
DAADX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DAADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAADX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DAADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAADX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEM
AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAADX vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAADXAVEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

1.89

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

2.48

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.82

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.52

11.10

-1.58

DAADX vs. AVEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the AVEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAADX and AVEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAADXAVEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.89

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.51

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between DAADX and AVEM is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DAADX vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison

DAADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, which matches AVEM's 2.41% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
DAADX
DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio
2.43%2.28%2.64%2.82%3.02%0.30%0.00%0.00%
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.41%2.45%3.17%3.06%2.77%2.61%1.60%0.35%

Drawdowns

DAADX vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAADX drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, smaller than the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAADX and AVEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DAADXAVEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.98%

-36.05%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-13.13%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.14%

-10.00%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-10.30%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.34%

-0.11%

Volatility

DAADX vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) is 8.67%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 10.36%. This indicates that DAADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DAADXAVEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.67%

10.36%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

14.72%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

20.03%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

17.87%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

20.37%

-6.49%