PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DAADX vs. EMXC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DAADX and EMXC is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

DAADX vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-4.60%
-3.02%
DAADX
EMXC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DAADX:

0.33

EMXC:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

DAADX:

0.50

EMXC:

0.58

Omega Ratio

DAADX:

1.07

EMXC:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

DAADX:

0.35

EMXC:

0.44

Martin Ratio

DAADX:

0.83

EMXC:

0.98

Ulcer Index

DAADX:

4.73%

EMXC:

5.18%

Daily Std Dev

DAADX:

11.90%

EMXC:

14.04%

Max Drawdown

DAADX:

-24.99%

EMXC:

-42.80%

Current Drawdown

DAADX:

-7.94%

EMXC:

-7.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAADX achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 3.43% return.


DAADX

YTD

1.51%

1M

1.20%

6M

-5.57%

1Y

3.01%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

EMXC

YTD

3.43%

1M

2.03%

6M

-4.45%

1Y

4.50%

5Y*

5.51%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAADX vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAADX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Expense ratio chart for EMXC: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%
Expense ratio chart for DAADX: current value at 0.43% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.43%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DAADX vs. EMXC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAADX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DAADX is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DAADX is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DAADX is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DAADX is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DAADX is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DAADX is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMXC is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMXC is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMXC is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMXC is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMXC is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMXC is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DAADX vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DAADX, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.330.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for DAADX, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.500.58
The chart of Omega ratio for DAADX, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.071.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for DAADX, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.350.44
The chart of Martin ratio for DAADX, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.830.98
DAADX
EMXC

The current DAADX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAADX and EMXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.33
0.36
DAADX
EMXC

Dividends

DAADX vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

DAADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, which matches EMXC's 2.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
DAADX
DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio
2.59%2.63%2.81%3.01%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.60%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%

Drawdowns

DAADX vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAADX drawdown since its inception was -24.99%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAADX and EMXC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.94%
-7.37%
DAADX
EMXC

Volatility

DAADX vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) is 3.59%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that DAADX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.59%
4.22%
DAADX
EMXC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab