AVXC vs. ABEMX
AVXC (Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF) and ABEMX (abrdn Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past year, AVXC returned 62.37% vs 65.91% for ABEMX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVXC charges 0.33%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for ABEMX.
Performance
AVXC vs. ABEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AVXC having a 34.06% return and ABEMX slightly lower at 33.53%.
AVXC
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 34.06%
- 6M
- 38.17%
- 1Y
- 62.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABEMX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 33.53%
- 6M
- 35.76%
- 1Y
- 65.91%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
AVXC vs. ABEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF | 34.06% | 31.45% | -0.80% |
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund | 33.53% | 32.43% | 1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVXC and ABEMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between AVXC and ABEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVXC vs. ABEMX — Risk / Return Rank
AVXC
ABEMX
AVXC vs. ABEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVXC | ABEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.64 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 4.83 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | 19.12 | -1.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVXC | ABEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12 | 3.47 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 0.38 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
AVXC vs. ABEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, smaller than the maximum ABEMX drawdown of -54.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and ABEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVXC | ABEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.44% | -54.52% | +34.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.04% | -13.68% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | 0.00% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -13.10% | +9.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 3.45% | +0.01% |
Volatility
AVXC vs. ABEMX - Volatility Comparison
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) have volatilities of 9.00% and 8.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVXC | ABEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 8.94% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 16.50% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 19.05% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 18.70% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 18.69% | -0.22% |
AVXC vs. ABEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEMX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVXC vs. ABEMX - Dividend Comparison
AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than ABEMX's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund | 4.57% | 6.11% | 0.99% | 1.42% | 1.82% | 22.95% | 0.68% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 2.47% |
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF | 1.49% | 1.97% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVXC and ABEMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVXC has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to ABEMX (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs ABEMX's -54.52%.
ABEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 3.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVXC and ABEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer