ABEMX vs. CGFIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ABEMX (abrdn Emerging Markets Fund) and CGFIX (abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund) are both mutual funds - ABEMX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Aberdeen, while CGFIX is a Multistrategy fund managed by Aberdeen. Over the past 10 years, ABEMX returned 8.47%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for CGFIX. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ABEMX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CGFIX.

Performance

ABEMX vs. CGFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEMX achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly higher than CGFIX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ABEMX has outperformed CGFIX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while CGFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.63% annualized return.

ABEMX

• 1D: 4.45%
• 1M: -3.58%
• 6M: 10.63%
• YTD: 19.82%
• 1Y: 41.51%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 8.47%
• ALL TIME*: 7.22%

CGFIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -1.42%
• 6M: -0.43%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 1Y: 3.20%
• 3Y*: 5.07%
• 5Y*: 0.27%
• 10Y*: 1.63%
• ALL TIME*: 4.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ABEMX vs. CGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund	19.82%	32.43%	3.98%	6.67%	-26.23%	7.15%	27.65%	20.42%	-14.65%	30.25%
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund	0.33%	5.79%	4.85%	-2.54%	-9.99%	1.39%	6.37%	7.26%	0.97%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEMX and CGFIX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2007	0.09

The correlation between ABEMX and CGFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (5 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ABEMX vs. CGFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABEMX

ABEMX Risk / Return Rank: 69
ABEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ABEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
ABEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ABEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ABEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CGFIX

CGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 37
CGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABEMX vs. CGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABEMX	CGFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.23	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.72	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.23	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	1.38	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.64	4.54	+4.09

ABEMX vs. CGFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the CGFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEMX and CGFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABEMX vs. CGFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEMX drawdown since its inception was -54.52%, which is greater than CGFIX's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEMX and CGFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABEMX	CGFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.52%	-20.28%	-34.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.58%	-2.78%	-11.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.62%	-5.01%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.56%	-20.28%	-16.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.44%	-20.28%	-18.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.78%	-2.65%	-8.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.04%	-3.19%	-9.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.53%	0.84%	+3.69%

Volatility

ABEMX vs. CGFIX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) at 0.84%. This indicates that ABEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABEMX	CGFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.52%	0.84%	+9.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.66%	2.48%	+20.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.52%	3.11%	+21.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.81%	5.74%	+14.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.20%	4.69%	+14.51%

ABEMX vs. CGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than CGFIX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABEMX vs. CGFIX - Dividend Comparison

ABEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, less than CGFIX's 5.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund	5.10%	6.11%	0.99%	1.42%	1.82%	22.95%	0.68%	1.85%	1.57%	1.32%	1.23%	2.47%
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund	5.66%	5.51%	6.43%	2.08%	0.00%	7.49%	0.23%	3.29%	6.05%	0.33%	1.12%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABEMX and CGFIX in my portfolio?

ABEMX and CGFIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABEMX or CGFIX?

ABEMX has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to CGFIX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEMX dropped -54.52% vs CGFIX's -20.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.