PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ABEMX vs. GLDM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


ABEMXGLDM
YTD Return-2.89%12.86%
1Y Return0.06%17.33%
3Y Return (Ann)-11.51%9.35%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.40%12.67%
Sharpe Ratio-0.091.32
Daily Std Dev13.38%12.23%
Max Drawdown-56.78%-21.63%
Current Drawdown-36.24%-2.57%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between ABEMX and GLDM is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ABEMX achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 12.86% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
7.54%
17.96%
ABEMX
GLDM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


abrdn Emerging Markets Fund

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.18% expense ratio.


ABEMX
abrdn Emerging Markets Fund
Expense ratio chart for ABEMX: current value at 1.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.10%
Expense ratio chart for GLDM: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABEMX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ABEMX, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ABEMX, currently valued at 0.00, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ABEMX, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ABEMX, currently valued at -0.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ABEMX, currently valued at -0.15, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00-0.15
GLDM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 2.00, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLDM, currently valued at 3.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.003.62

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ABEMX and GLDM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.06
1.32
ABEMX
GLDM

Dividends

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

ABEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ABEMX
abrdn Emerging Markets Fund
1.47%1.42%1.82%11.80%0.87%1.85%1.57%1.32%1.23%2.62%4.74%1.40%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEMX drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEMX and GLDM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-36.24%
-2.57%
ABEMX
GLDM

Volatility

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) is 2.89%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that ABEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%5.50%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
2.89%
5.15%
ABEMX
GLDM