ABEMX vs. GLDM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).

ABEMX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on May 10, 2007. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018.

Performance

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund	0.00%	32.43%	3.98%	6.67%	-26.23%	7.15%	27.65%	20.42%	-4.33%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	8.57%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.84%

Returns By Period

ABEMX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -12.29%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 3.92%
• 1Y: 31.27%
• 3Y*: 11.71%
• 5Y*: 2.66%
• 10Y*: 7.45%

GLDM

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.99%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 21.24%
• 1Y: 49.77%
• 3Y*: 33.33%
• 5Y*: 21.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

ABEMX

abrdn Emerging Markets Fund

GLDM

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

Return for Risk

ABEMX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEMX

ABEMX Risk / Return Rank: 84
ABEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ABEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ABEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ABEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ABEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 88
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABEMX	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.82	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.25	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	2.71	-0.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.65	10.04	-1.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEMX and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABEMX	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	1.82	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	1.25	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	1.09	-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between ABEMX and GLDM is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

ABEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund	6.11%	6.11%	0.99%	1.42%	1.82%	22.95%	0.68%	1.85%	1.57%	1.32%	1.23%	2.47%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEMX drawdown since its inception was -54.52%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEMX and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABEMX	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.52%	-21.63%	-32.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.68%	-19.14%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.56%	-20.92%	-15.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.68%	-13.19%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.20%	-6.04%	-7.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	5.16%	-1.88%

Volatility

ABEMX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) is 9.17%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that ABEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABEMX	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.17%	11.01%	-1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.69%	24.07%	-10.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.22%	27.57%	-9.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.13%	17.65%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.41%	16.77%	+1.64%