AVUV vs. SCHG
AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. AVUV is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 10.85%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for SCHG. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
AVUV vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.75% return.
AVUV
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 36.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
AVUV vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 18.87% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUV and SCHG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between AVUV and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AVUV vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUV
SCHG
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
AVUV
SCHG
Energy
AVUV
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
AVUV
SCHG
Industrials
AVUV
SCHG
Technology
AVUV
SCHG
Basic Materials
AVUV
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
AVUV
SCHG
Healthcare
AVUV
SCHG
Communication Services
AVUV
SCHG
Real Estate
AVUV
SCHG
Utilities
AVUV
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUV vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
AVUV
SCHG
AVUV vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 1.27 | +3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 4.25 | +9.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 1.33 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.67 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.83 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
AVUV vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -34.59% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -16.41% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -23.39% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -34.59% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -4.25% | +3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -5.20% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 4.91% | -2.24% |
Volatility
AVUV vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.29%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 4.52% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 12.02% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 15.77% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 22.31% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.29% | 21.58% | +6.71% |
AVUV vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVUV vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUV and SCHG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to AVUV (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 14.90% vs 10.85% for AVUV. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 14.90% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.
AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.04% for SCHG.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUV and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer