PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVUV vs. FNDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVUV vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's 14.40% return.


AVUV

1D
1.01%
1M
0.89%
YTD
18.87%
6M
18.74%
1Y
36.82%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*

FNDA

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
14.40%
6M
14.29%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUV vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
18.87%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
14.40%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUV and FNDA is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.97

The correlation between AVUV and FNDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVUV vs. FNDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVUV
FNDA

Financial Services

25.8%
14.6%

Energy

18.2%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

18.0%
12.2%

Industrials

13.9%
18.9%

Technology

7.0%
14.9%

Basic Materials

4.9%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.2%

Healthcare

4.2%
6.8%

Communication Services

2.8%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.7%
9.9%

Utilities

0.1%
2.8%

Financial Services

AVUV
25.8%
FNDA
14.6%

Energy

AVUV
18.2%
FNDA
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AVUV
18.0%
FNDA
12.2%

Industrials

AVUV
13.9%
FNDA
18.9%

Technology

AVUV
7.0%
FNDA
14.9%

Basic Materials

AVUV
4.9%
FNDA
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

AVUV
4.5%
FNDA
4.2%

Healthcare

AVUV
4.2%
FNDA
6.8%

Communication Services

AVUV
2.8%
FNDA
4.1%

Real Estate

AVUV
0.7%
FNDA
9.9%

Utilities

AVUV
0.1%
FNDA
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVUV vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUV vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVUVFNDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

3.13

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

10.09

+3.72

AVUV vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUV and FNDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVUVFNDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.70

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.32

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.49

+0.07

Drawdowns

AVUV vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, which is greater than FNDA's maximum drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and FNDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVUVFNDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.42%

-44.64%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-9.36%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.79%

-25.92%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

-25.92%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.42%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-6.69%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.90%

-0.23%

Volatility

AVUV vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.29%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVUVFNDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

4.61%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

11.98%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

17.24%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.75%

20.91%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.29%

22.39%

+5.90%

AVUV vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AVUV and FNDA have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVUV vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than FNDA's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.28%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.09%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AVUV and FNDA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNDA has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to AVUV (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs FNDA's -44.64%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.85% vs 6.73% for FNDA. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV and FNDA have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.09% for FNDA.

AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FNDA is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Charles Schwab.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVUV and FNDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer