PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVUS vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVUS vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUS achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.


AVUS

1D
-0.46%
1M
4.77%
YTD
14.42%
6M
14.71%
1Y
32.34%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUS vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
14.42%16.68%20.43%21.77%-13.82%28.73%17.58%8.87%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUS and QUS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.94

The correlation between AVUS and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVUS vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVUS
QUS

Technology

27.5%
26.3%

Financial Services

15.2%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
5.8%

Industrials

11.5%
8.6%

Communication Services

9.8%
10.2%

Energy

7.4%
4.6%

Healthcare

7.1%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
9.2%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.3%

Utilities

2.5%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.4%

Technology

AVUS
27.5%
QUS
26.3%

Financial Services

AVUS
15.2%
QUS
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AVUS
11.8%
QUS
5.8%

Industrials

AVUS
11.5%
QUS
8.6%

Communication Services

AVUS
9.8%
QUS
10.2%

Energy

AVUS
7.4%
QUS
4.6%

Healthcare

AVUS
7.1%
QUS
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

AVUS
4.4%
QUS
9.2%

Basic Materials

AVUS
2.7%
QUS
2.3%

Utilities

AVUS
2.5%
QUS
3.6%

Real Estate

AVUS
0.2%
QUS
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVUS vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUS vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVUSQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

2.59

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.85

11.54

+7.31

AVUS vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUS and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVUSQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.95

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.78

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.77

+0.02

Drawdowns

AVUS vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVUSQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-33.78%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-6.85%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

-13.94%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-22.30%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.50%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-3.70%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.53%

+0.19%

Volatility

AVUS vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that AVUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVUSQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

1.78%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

6.66%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

9.09%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

14.33%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

16.42%

+4.43%

AVUS vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AVUS and QUS have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVUS vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
0.91%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVUS and QUS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUS has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.04% vs 11.08% for QUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUS and QUS have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.91% for AVUS.

AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and State Street.

AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVUS and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer