AVUS vs. QUS
AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while QUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). AVUS is actively managed, while QUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUS returned 13.04%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
AVUS vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUS achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.
AVUS
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
AVUS vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.42% | 16.68% | 20.43% | 21.77% | -13.82% | 28.73% | 17.58% | 8.87% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.67% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 7.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUS and QUS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between AVUS and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUS vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUS
QUS
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVUS
QUS
Financial Services
AVUS
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
AVUS
QUS
Industrials
AVUS
QUS
Communication Services
AVUS
QUS
Energy
AVUS
QUS
Healthcare
AVUS
QUS
Consumer Defensive
AVUS
QUS
Basic Materials
AVUS
QUS
Utilities
AVUS
QUS
Real Estate
AVUS
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUS vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
AVUS
QUS
AVUS vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUS | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 2.59 | +1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.85 | 11.54 | +7.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUS | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 1.95 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.78 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.77 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
AVUS vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUS | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -33.78% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -6.85% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -13.94% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -22.30% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.50% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -3.70% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.53% | +0.19% |
Volatility
AVUS vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that AVUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUS | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 1.78% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 6.66% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 9.09% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 14.33% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 16.42% | +4.43% |
AVUS vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AVUS and QUS have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVUS vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUS and QUS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVUS has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.04% vs 11.08% for QUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUS and QUS have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.91% for AVUS.
AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and State Street.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUS and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer