AVUS vs. MFUS
AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. AVUS is actively managed, while MFUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUS returned 13.04%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
AVUS vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUS achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
AVUS
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.42% | 16.68% | 20.43% | 21.77% | -13.82% | 28.73% | 17.58% | 8.87% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 5.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUS and MFUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AVUS and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUS vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUS
MFUS
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVUS
MFUS
Financial Services
AVUS
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
AVUS
MFUS
Industrials
AVUS
MFUS
Communication Services
AVUS
MFUS
Energy
AVUS
MFUS
Healthcare
AVUS
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
AVUS
MFUS
Basic Materials
AVUS
MFUS
Utilities
AVUS
MFUS
Real Estate
AVUS
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUS vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
AVUS
MFUS
AVUS vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 4.41 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.85 | 18.13 | +0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.63 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.86 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.79 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
AVUS vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -35.21% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -6.39% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -15.39% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -18.22% | -3.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | 0.00% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -4.00% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.55% | +0.17% |
Volatility
AVUS vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) is 2.98%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that AVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.19% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 8.22% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 10.72% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 15.03% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 17.35% | +3.50% |
AVUS vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVUS vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUS and MFUS have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to AVUS (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.04% vs 12.82% for MFUS. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.91% for AVUS.
AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUS and 0.30% for MFUS.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUS and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer