AVUS vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AVUS is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUS returned 13.04%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for DFND. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

AVUS vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AVUS

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 14.42%
• 6M: 14.71%
• 1Y: 32.34%
• 3Y*: 22.35%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUS vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF	14.42%	16.68%	20.43%	21.77%	-13.82%	28.73%	17.58%	8.87%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	12.13%	-19.59%	14.80%	16.12%	4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUS and DFND is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between AVUS and DFND has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AVUS vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVUS	DFND
Technology	27.5%	24.8%
Financial Services	15.2%	18.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	3.5%
Industrials	11.5%	17.1%
Communication Services	9.8%	0.8%
Energy	7.4%	1.7%
Healthcare	7.1%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	4.2%
Basic Materials	2.7%	4.3%
Utilities	2.5%	-
Real Estate	0.2%	2.0%

Return for Risk

AVUS vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUS

AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 81
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUS vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVUS	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	0.02	+2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	0.11	+3.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.02	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.14	0.07	+4.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.85	0.13	+18.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVUS vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUS and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVUS	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	0.02	+2.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.21	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.36	+0.44

Drawdowns

AVUS vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVUS	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.04%	-22.65%	-14.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.85%	-3.44%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.74%	-12.56%	-7.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.19%	-22.65%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-3.69%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-5.70%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	3.70%	-1.98%

Volatility

AVUS vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that AVUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVUS	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	0.00%	+2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	6.16%	+2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.15%	10.92%	+1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	22.46%	-5.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.85%	19.09%	+1.76%

AVUS vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVUS vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF	0.91%	1.08%	1.27%	1.41%	1.59%	1.08%	1.19%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVUS and DFND in my portfolio?

AVUS and DFND have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVUS or DFND?

AVUS has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, AVUS or DFND?

On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.04% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVUS or DFND?

Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVUS or DFND?

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVUS or DFND?

AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

What is the main difference between AVUS and DFND?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUS and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.