AVUQ vs. UGA
AVUQ (Avantis U.S. Quality ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. AVUQ is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, AVUQ returned 24.50% vs 59.74% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. AVUQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
AVUQ vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUQ achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.
AVUQ
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- 24.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
AVUQ vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF | 7.35% | 21.84% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUQ and UGA is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUQ vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
AVUQ
UGA
AVUQ vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVUQ | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.17 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.13 | 9.39 | -1.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVUQ vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUQ drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUQ and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUQ | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -86.59% | +74.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.61% | -18.96% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -18.05% | +13.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -36.69% | +34.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 6.43% | -3.41% |
Volatility
AVUQ vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) is 5.97%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that AVUQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUQ | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 9.24% | -3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 30.57% | -17.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 35.22% | -19.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 34.45% | -14.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 37.22% | -17.55% |
AVUQ vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVUQ vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
AVUQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF | 0.46% | 0.32% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUQ and UGA have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to AVUQ (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUQ dropped -12.35% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 59.74% vs 24.50% for AVUQ. On fees, AVUQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 59.74% return vs 24.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
AVUQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
AVUQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUQ and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUQ and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer