AVUQ vs. BBUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVUQ (Avantis U.S. Quality ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AVUQ is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. Over the past year, AVUQ returned 30.44% vs 27.47% for BBUS. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVUQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.

Performance

AVUQ vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUQ achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.

AVUQ

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 6M: 11.01%
• 1Y: 30.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBUS

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 10.47%
• 1Y: 27.47%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUQ vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF	11.23%	22.52%
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	10.60%	21.42%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUQ and BBUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.96

The correlation between AVUQ and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVUQ vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVUQ	BBUS
Technology	46.3%	37.1%
Consumer Cyclical	15.1%	9.4%
Communication Services	12.2%	10.8%
Industrials	7.7%	7.2%
Financial Services	5.8%	10.8%
Healthcare	5.3%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	4.5%
Energy	2.5%	3.2%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.2%
Utilities	0.8%	2.6%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.7%

Return for Risk

AVUQ vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUQ

AVUQ Risk / Return Rank: 56
AVUQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
AVUQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
AVUQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
AVUQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
AVUQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 68
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUQ vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVUQ	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.33	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.18	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	3.00	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	13.76	-3.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVUQ vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUQ and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVUQ	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	2.33	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	0.84	+0.71

Drawdowns

AVUQ vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUQ drawdown since its inception was -11.86%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUQ and BBUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVUQ	BBUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.86%	-35.35%	+23.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.61%	-9.21%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-0.74%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.08%	-5.46%	+3.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	2.00%	+0.92%

Volatility

AVUQ vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that AVUQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVUQ	BBUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	2.88%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	8.96%	+2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	11.87%	+3.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.42%	17.03%	+2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.42%	19.59%	-0.17%

AVUQ vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVUQ vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

AVUQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF	0.35%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	0.98%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVUQ and BBUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, AVUQ and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVUQ or BBUS?

AVUQ has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUQ dropped -11.86% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

Which ETF is better, AVUQ or BBUS?

On 1-year performance, AVUQ leads with 30.44% vs 27.47% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVUQ or BBUS?

Over the 1-year period, AVUQ has performed better with a 30.44% return vs 27.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVUQ or BBUS?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVUQ or BBUS?

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.35% for AVUQ.

What is the main difference between AVUQ and BBUS?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis Investors and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUQ and 0.02% for BBUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.