AVOS vs. NXTE
AVOS (Avos Global Equities ETF) and NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVOS charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for NXTE.
Performance
AVOS vs. NXTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVOS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTE
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 34.42%
- 6M
- 32.69%
- 1Y
- 53.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVOS vs. NXTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 8.23% |
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 28.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVOS and NXTE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.76 |
AVOS vs. NXTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVOS
NXTE
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVOS
NXTE
Financial Services
AVOS
NXTE
Industrials
AVOS
NXTE
Healthcare
AVOS
NXTE
Consumer Cyclical
AVOS
NXTE
Communication Services
AVOS
NXTE
Energy
AVOS
NXTE
-
Basic Materials
AVOS
NXTE
Consumer Defensive
AVOS
NXTE
Utilities
AVOS
NXTE
Real Estate
AVOS
NXTE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVOS vs. NXTE — Risk / Return Rank
AVOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NXTE
AVOS vs. NXTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVOS | NXTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVOS vs. NXTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum NXTE drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and NXTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVOS | NXTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -28.64% | +23.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -4.74% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -7.81% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.45% | — |
Volatility
AVOS vs. NXTE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVOS | NXTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 27.84% | -9.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 26.73% | -8.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 26.73% | -8.06% |
AVOS vs. NXTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVOS has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTE's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVOS vs. NXTE - Dividend Comparison
AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 0.49% | 0.36% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVOS and NXTE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVOS is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVOS is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.
NXTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.
They also come from different issuers: Avos and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AVOS and 1.00% for NXTE.
Find the right allocation for AVOS and NXTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer