AVO vs. UFCS
AVO (Mission Produce, Inc.) and UFCS (United Fire Group, Inc.) are both stocks. AVO operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while UFCS operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, AVO returned -8.38%/yr vs 18.78%/yr for UFCS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AVO vs. UFCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVO achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly lower than UFCS's 43.58% return.
AVO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 19.02%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
UFCS
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- 6M
- 47.06%
- YTD
- 43.58%
- 1Y
- 94.32%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 18.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
AVO vs. UFCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVO Mission Produce, Inc. | 14.91% | -19.28% | 42.42% | -13.17% | -25.99% | 4.32% | 22.86% |
UFCS United Fire Group, Inc. | 43.58% | 30.48% | 45.32% | -24.30% | 20.49% | -5.52% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVO and UFCS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
AVO:
$941.87M
UFCS:
$1.33B
AVO:
$0.32
UFCS:
$7.41
AVO:
41.47
UFCS:
6.97
AVO:
0.76
UFCS:
0.64
AVO:
$1.25B
UFCS:
$1.43B
AVO:
$152.90M
UFCS:
$325.77M
AVO:
$83.10M
UFCS:
$140.18M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVO vs. UFCS — Risk / Return Rank
AVO
UFCS
AVO vs. UFCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVO | UFCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.49 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 7.52 | -7.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 22.54 | -21.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVO vs. UFCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVO drawdown since its inception was -62.71%, smaller than the maximum UFCS drawdown of -69.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVO and UFCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVO | UFCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.71% | -69.89% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.09% | -12.24% | -21.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.09% | -24.94% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.54% | -47.99% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.25% | -4.17% | -37.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.12% | -26.43% | -11.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.88% | 4.08% | +7.80% |
Volatility
AVO vs. UFCS - Volatility Comparison
Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) has a higher volatility of 12.98% compared to United Fire Group, Inc. (UFCS) at 7.85%. This indicates that AVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UFCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVO | UFCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.98% | 7.85% | +5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.97% | 22.35% | +6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.01% | 32.47% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.84% | 39.42% | -3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.88% | 38.85% | -1.97% |
Dividends
AVO vs. UFCS - Dividend Comparison
AVO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UFCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVO Mission Produce, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFCS United Fire Group, Inc. | 1.39% | 1.76% | 2.25% | 3.18% | 2.30% | 2.59% | 4.54% | 2.97% | 7.59% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.24% |
Financials
AVO vs. UFCS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mission Produce, Inc. and United Fire Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AVO vs. UFCS - Profitability Comparison
AVO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.50M and revenue of 290.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.1%.
UFCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 369.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AVO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported an operating income of -7.00M and revenue of 290.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.
UFCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 369.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
AVO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported a net income of -7.20M and revenue of 290.90M, resulting in a net margin of -2.5%.
UFCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, United Fire Group, Inc. reported a net income of 30.05M and revenue of 369.44M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVO and UFCS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVO has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to UFCS (7.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVO dropped -62.71% vs UFCS's -69.89%.
UFCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVO and UFCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer