AVNM vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AVNM (Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. AVNM is actively managed, while FNDF is passively managed. Over the past year, AVNM returned 32.61% vs 39.04% for FNDF. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVNM charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

AVNM vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNM achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 16.43% return.

AVNM

• 1D: -2.89%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 12.75%
• 6M: 12.64%
• 1Y: 32.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDF

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 16.43%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 39.04%
• 3Y*: 22.45%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNM vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	12.75%	38.30%	5.52%	8.60%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	16.43%	40.99%	2.29%	7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AVNM and FNDF is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.96

The correlation between AVNM and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNM vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVNM	FNDF
Financial Services	22.5%	16.2%
Industrials	17.1%	15.5%
Technology	15.0%	14.4%
Basic Materials	11.4%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	10.8%
Energy	7.7%	10.9%
Communication Services	4.4%	4.9%
Healthcare	4.2%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	6.5%
Utilities	2.6%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.5%	0.8%

Return for Risk

AVNM vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNM

AVNM Risk / Return Rank: 63
AVNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
AVNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
AVNM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
AVNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
AVNM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 76
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNM vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVNM	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	2.43	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	3.16	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.44	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	3.70	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	13.74	-2.89

AVNM vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNM and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVNM vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNM drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNM and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVNM	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.03%	-40.14%	+26.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.59%	-10.60%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.91%	-4.59%	+1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.54%	-7.62%	+5.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.85%	+0.16%

Volatility

AVNM vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 7.02% and 6.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVNM	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	6.77%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.04%	13.93%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	16.16%	-0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	16.36%	-1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	17.47%	-2.29%

AVNM vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNM has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVNM vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

AVNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than FNDF's 2.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	3.61%	2.76%	3.51%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.95%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVNM and FNDF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, AVNM and FNDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVNM or FNDF?

AVNM has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to FNDF (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNM dropped -14.03% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, AVNM or FNDF?

On 1-year performance, FNDF leads with 39.04% vs 32.61% for AVNM. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 6.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVNM or FNDF?

Over the 1-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 39.04% return vs 32.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVNM or FNDF?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for AVNM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVNM or FNDF?

AVNM has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.95% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between AVNM and FNDF?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for AVNM and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.