AVNM vs. CGXU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVNM (Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF) and CGXU (Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVNM returned 35.92% vs 41.14% for CGXU. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVNM charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for CGXU.

Performance

AVNM vs. CGXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNM achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than CGXU's 19.90% return.

AVNM

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 17.96%
• 1Y: 35.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGXU

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 10.58%
• YTD: 19.90%
• 6M: 22.54%
• 1Y: 41.14%
• 3Y*: 18.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNM vs. CGXU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	14.81%	38.30%	5.52%	8.60%
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	19.90%	26.31%	4.36%	2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AVNM and CGXU is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.91

The correlation between AVNM and CGXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNM vs. CGXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVNM	CGXU
Financial Services	23.2%	13.9%
Industrials	17.1%	15.4%
Technology	12.5%	21.6%
Basic Materials	11.7%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	6.6%
Energy	8.3%	7.5%
Healthcare	4.4%	4.7%
Communication Services	4.3%	10.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	6.2%
Utilities	2.9%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

AVNM vs. CGXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNM

AVNM Risk / Return Rank: 69
AVNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AVNM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AVNM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CGXU

CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 62
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNM vs. CGXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVNM	CGXU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.09	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	2.85	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.37	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	3.14	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	11.72	+0.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVNM vs. CGXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNM Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the CGXU Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNM and CGXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVNM	CGXU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.09	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.56	+0.98

Drawdowns

AVNM vs. CGXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNM drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum CGXU drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNM and CGXU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVNM	CGXU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.03%	-25.64%	+11.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.59%	-13.14%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-1.14%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.55%	-6.66%	+4.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	3.52%	-0.56%

Volatility

AVNM vs. CGXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) is 5.19%, while Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that AVNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVNM	CGXU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	7.31%	-2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	17.05%	-4.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	19.83%	-5.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	19.93%	-5.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	19.93%	-5.07%

AVNM vs. CGXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNM has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than CGXU's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVNM vs. CGXU - Dividend Comparison

AVNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than CGXU's 4.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	2.51%	2.76%	3.51%	1.69%	0.00%
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	4.43%	5.31%	1.01%	0.99%	0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVNM and CGXU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AVNM and CGXU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVNM or CGXU?

CGXU has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to AVNM (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNM dropped -14.03% vs CGXU's -25.64%.

Which ETF is better, AVNM or CGXU?

On 1-year performance, CGXU leads with 41.14% vs 35.92% for AVNM. On fees, AVNM is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, AVNM has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVNM or CGXU?

Over the 1-year period, CGXU has performed better with a 41.14% return vs 35.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVNM or CGXU?

AVNM is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGXU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVNM or CGXU?

CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 2.51% for AVNM.

What is the main difference between AVNM and CGXU?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for AVNM and 0.54% for CGXU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.