AVGW vs. FDL
AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. AVGW is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. AVGW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.
Performance
AVGW vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGW achieves a 43.84% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return.
AVGW
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 17.30%
- YTD
- 43.84%
- 6M
- 27.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
AVGW vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 43.84% | 20.91% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.33% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGW and FDL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | -0.17 |
AVGW vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVGW
FDL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
AVGW
FDL
Basic Materials
AVGW
-
FDL
Communication Services
AVGW
-
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
AVGW
-
FDL
Consumer Defensive
AVGW
-
FDL
Energy
AVGW
-
FDL
Financial Services
AVGW
-
FDL
Healthcare
AVGW
-
FDL
Industrials
AVGW
-
FDL
Real Estate
AVGW
-
FDL
-
Utilities
AVGW
-
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGW vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
AVGW
FDL
AVGW vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGW | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 0.45 | +1.24 |
Drawdowns
AVGW vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGW drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGW and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGW | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -65.93% | +31.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -2.18% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -9.66% | -2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
AVGW vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGW | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.65% | 11.28% | +42.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.65% | 14.31% | +39.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.65% | 17.11% | +36.54% |
AVGW vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGW vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
AVGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.45%, more than FDL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 44.45% | 31.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGW and FDL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.
AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 44.45%, compared with 3.68% for FDL.
AVGW is categorized as Derivative Income, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AVGW and 0.45% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for AVGW and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer