AVGV vs. SCHG
AVGV (Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGV is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. AVGV is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, AVGV returned 36.52% vs 24.64% for SCHG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVGV charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
AVGV vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGV achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return.
AVGV
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 16.99%
- 6M
- 18.62%
- 1Y
- 36.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 25.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.59%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
AVGV vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGV Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF | 16.99% | 22.57% | 11.26% | 11.36% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 6.42% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 12.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGV and SCHG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between AVGV and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVGV vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVGV
SCHG
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
AVGV
SCHG
Industrials
AVGV
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
AVGV
SCHG
Energy
AVGV
SCHG
Technology
AVGV
SCHG
Basic Materials
AVGV
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
AVGV
SCHG
Communication Services
AVGV
SCHG
Healthcare
AVGV
SCHG
Real Estate
AVGV
SCHG
Utilities
AVGV
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGV vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
AVGV
SCHG
AVGV vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVGV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.28 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 1.51 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.72 | 5.04 | +12.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 1.60 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.46 | 0.84 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
AVGV vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGV drawdown since its inception was -17.03%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGV and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.03% | -34.59% | +17.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -16.41% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -1.78% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -5.20% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 4.90% | -2.83% |
Volatility
AVGV vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGV | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 3.61% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 11.62% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 15.50% | -2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 22.27% | -7.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 21.55% | -6.58% |
AVGV vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVGV vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
AVGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGV Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.32% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGV and SCHG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGV has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGV dropped -17.03% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 36.52% vs 24.64% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 36.52% return vs 24.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for AVGV.
AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.
AVGV is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for AVGV and 0.04% for SCHG.
AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVGV and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer