AVGU vs. MSFL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AVGU (GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF) and MSFL (GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVGU returned 34.11% vs -26.66% for MSFL. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AVGU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for MSFL.

Performance

AVGU vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGU achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly higher than MSFL's -10.77% return.

AVGU

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 15.33%
• 6M: 17.74%
• YTD: 6.01%
• 1Y: 34.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 39.51%

MSFL

• 1D: 9.72%
• 1M: 51.15%
• 6M: 19.21%
• YTD: -10.77%
• 1Y: -26.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVGU GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF	$2.09M	$2.95M	$5.92M
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	$42.00M	$33.79M	$35.34M

AVGU vs. MSFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVGU GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF	6.01%	33.87%
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	-10.77%	-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGU and MSFL is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

AVGU vs. MSFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVGU

AVGU Risk / Return Rank: 23
AVGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
AVGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
AVGU Omega Ratio Rank: 29
AVGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
AVGU Martin Ratio Rank: 19

MSFL

MSFL Risk / Return Rank: 6
MSFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MSFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MSFL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MSFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MSFL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVGU vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVGU	MSFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	-0.42	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	-0.27	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.97	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	-0.43	+1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.19	-0.71	+1.91

AVGU vs. MSFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the MSFL Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGU and MSFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVGU vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGU drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, smaller than the maximum MSFL drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGU and MSFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGU	MSFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.30%	-62.08%	+8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.30%	-62.08%	+8.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.17%	-30.47%	-8.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.90%	-23.69%	+0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.67%	37.36%	-8.69%

Volatility

AVGU vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) is 24.87%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a volatility of 30.67%. This indicates that AVGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVGU	MSFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.87%	30.67%	-5.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.09%	52.19%	+17.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.06%	63.60%	+31.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.37%	54.66%	+38.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.37%	54.66%	+38.71%

AVGU vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVGU vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

Neither AVGU nor MSFL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGU and MSFL in my portfolio?

AVGU and MSFL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVGU or MSFL?

MSFL has higher volatility (30.67%) compared to AVGU (24.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGU dropped -53.30% vs MSFL's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, AVGU or MSFL?

On 1-year performance, AVGU leads with 34.11% vs -26.66% for MSFL. On fees, MSFL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, AVGU has been the lower-risk option at 24.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVGU or MSFL?

Over the 1-year period, AVGU has performed better with a 34.11% return vs -26.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVGU or MSFL?

MSFL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AVGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVGU or MSFL?

AVGU and MSFL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AVGU and MSFL?

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AVGU and 1.15% for MSFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.