AVGU vs. AMDL

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

AVGU (GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. AVGU is actively managed, while AMDL is passively managed. Over the past year, AVGU returned 42.21% vs 696.99% for AMDL. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVGU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

AVGU vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGU achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 359.74% return.

AVGU

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: 1.90%
• YTD: 6.23%
• 1Y: 42.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: 4.81%
• 1M: 8.09%
• 6M: 336.71%
• YTD: 359.74%
• 1Y: 696.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGU vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVGU GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF	6.23%	33.87%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	359.74%	73.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGU and AMDL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

AVGU vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGU vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVGU	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	5.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.78	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.48	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	12.53	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	24.23	—

Drawdowns

AVGU vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGU drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGU and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGU	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.30%	-88.63%	+35.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.30%	-56.13%	+2.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.05%	-13.61%	-25.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.88%	-46.91%	+25.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	28.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AVGU	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	44.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	106.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	94.18%	137.30%	-43.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.18%	119.22%	-25.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.18%	119.22%	-25.04%

AVGU vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDL's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVGU vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither AVGU nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGU and AMDL in my portfolio?

AVGU and AMDL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AVGU or AMDL?

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 696.99% vs 42.21% for AVGU. On fees, AMDL is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVGU or AMDL?

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 696.99% return vs 42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVGU or AMDL?

AMDL is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AVGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVGU or AMDL?

AVGU and AMDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AVGU and AMDL?

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AVGU and 1.07% for AMDL.