AVGO vs. CL
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. AVGO operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, AVGO returned 40.96%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for CL. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AVGO vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, AVGO has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 40.96%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.62% annualized return.
AVGO
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -10.14%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 54.87%
- 3Y*
- 67.17%
- 5Y*
- 55.09%
- 10Y*
- 40.96%
CL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 1.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
AVGO vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 10.62% | 50.63% | 110.49% | 104.18% | -13.27% | 56.48% | 44.88% | 29.05% | 2.18% | 48.19% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGO and CL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009 | 0.15 |
The correlation between AVGO and CL shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AVGO:
$1.86T
CL:
$72.02B
AVGO:
$6.01
CL:
$2.58
AVGO:
63.58
CL:
34.68
AVGO:
0.79
CL:
8.96
AVGO:
24.70
CL:
3.48
AVGO:
21.24
CL:
496.66
AVGO:
$75.47B
CL:
$20.80B
AVGO:
$50.53B
CL:
$12.49B
AVGO:
$41.76B
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGO vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
AVGO
CL
AVGO vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVGO | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.01 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | -0.08 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | -0.14 | +4.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVGO vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, smaller than the maximum CL drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGO | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.30% | -58.91% | +10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.67% | -18.64% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.15% | -29.05% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.15% | -29.05% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.30% | -29.05% | -19.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.66% | -14.31% | -6.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -11.24% | +3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 11.35% | +0.95% |
Volatility
AVGO vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a higher volatility of 20.53% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 8.32%. This indicates that AVGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGO | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.53% | 8.32% | +12.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.04% | 17.28% | +17.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.57% | 21.83% | +23.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.39% | 18.81% | +24.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 19.75% | +19.77% |
Dividends
AVGO vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than CL's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.65% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Financials
AVGO vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadcom Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AVGO vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
AVGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
AVGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
AVGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGO and CL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGO has higher volatility (20.53%) compared to CL (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGO dropped -48.30% vs CL's -58.91%.
AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVGO and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer