AVES vs. EDIV
AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. AVES is actively managed, while EDIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVES returned 20.73%/yr vs 19.05%/yr for EDIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVES charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EDIV.
Performance
AVES vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVES achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 6.42% return.
AVES
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDIV
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
AVES vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 16.79% | 30.49% | 4.50% | 16.79% | -16.04% | 1.32% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 6.42% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVES and EDIV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between AVES and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVES vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVES
EDIV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Financial Services
AVES
EDIV
Technology
AVES
EDIV
Industrials
AVES
EDIV
Basic Materials
AVES
EDIV
Consumer Cyclical
AVES
EDIV
Communication Services
AVES
EDIV
Energy
AVES
EDIV
Consumer Defensive
AVES
EDIV
Real Estate
AVES
EDIV
Healthcare
AVES
EDIV
Utilities
AVES
EDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVES vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank
AVES
EDIV
AVES vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVES | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 1.16 | +1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 1.70 | +1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.22 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 1.37 | +1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 4.23 | +6.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVES | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.16 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.17 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
AVES vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVES drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVES and EDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVES | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -53.36% | +25.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -10.36% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -13.84% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -4.07% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -19.36% | +11.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 3.34% | +0.13% |
Volatility
AVES vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.11%. This indicates that AVES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVES | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 4.11% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 10.03% | +4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 12.19% | +5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 13.83% | +3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 17.49% | -0.51% |
AVES vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVES has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVES vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison
AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than EDIV's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.81% | 3.17% | 4.09% | 3.96% | 3.70% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.50% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVES and EDIV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVES has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVES dropped -27.40% vs EDIV's -53.36%.
On 3-year performance, AVES leads with 20.73% vs 19.05% for EDIV. On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVES has performed better with a 20.73% return vs 19.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 2.81% for AVES.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVES and 0.49% for EDIV.
AVES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVES and EDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer