PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVDV vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVDV vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVDV achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 19.66% return.


AVDV

1D
0.89%
1M
0.12%
YTD
14.99%
6M
17.18%
1Y
41.91%
3Y*
26.72%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*

FNDF

1D
0.39%
1M
2.91%
YTD
19.66%
6M
21.60%
1Y
41.60%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVDV vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
14.99%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%11.78%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
19.66%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDV and FNDF is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.93

The correlation between AVDV and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVDV vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVDV
FNDF

Industrials

22.8%
15.5%

Basic Materials

21.0%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
10.8%

Financial Services

13.6%
16.2%

Energy

9.6%
10.9%

Technology

6.6%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
6.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
4.9%

Healthcare

2.3%
5.2%

Utilities

1.7%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.8%

Industrials

AVDV
22.8%
FNDF
15.5%

Basic Materials

AVDV
21.0%
FNDF
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AVDV
15.4%
FNDF
10.8%

Financial Services

AVDV
13.6%
FNDF
16.2%

Energy

AVDV
9.6%
FNDF
10.9%

Technology

AVDV
6.6%
FNDF
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

AVDV
3.4%
FNDF
6.5%

Communication Services

AVDV
2.4%
FNDF
4.9%

Healthcare

AVDV
2.3%
FNDF
5.2%

Utilities

AVDV
1.7%
FNDF
3.5%

Real Estate

AVDV
1.3%
FNDF
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVDV vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVDV vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVDVFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.82

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.44

14.27

-1.82

AVDV vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDV and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVDV vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVDVFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.01%

-40.14%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-10.60%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-13.89%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-25.56%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-1.94%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-7.63%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.84%

+0.46%

Volatility

AVDV vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) is 6.26%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that AVDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVDVFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

6.65%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

13.64%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

16.00%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

16.35%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

17.71%

+2.06%

AVDV vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVDV vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than FNDF's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
4.11%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.87%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVDV and FNDF have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to AVDV (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.63% vs 13.11% for FNDF. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 2.87% for FNDF.

AVDV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVDV and 0.25% for FNDF.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVDV and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer