AVDE vs. QGRW

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AVDE (Avantis International Equity ETF) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AVDE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. AVDE is actively managed, while QGRW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVDE returned 19.56%/yr vs 26.27%/yr for QGRW. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVDE charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

AVDE vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AVDE having a 10.87% return and QGRW slightly lower at 10.35%.

AVDE

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 10.87%
• 6M: 12.42%
• 1Y: 27.50%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 9.98%
• 10Y*: —

QGRW

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.31%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 11.58%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: 26.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVDE vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF	10.87%	38.05%	4.88%	17.18%	-2.13%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	10.35%	19.20%	34.85%	56.05%	-3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDE and QGRW is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022	0.59

The correlation between AVDE and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVDE vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVDE	QGRW
Financial Services	23.8%	4.1%
Industrials	20.3%	8.0%
Basic Materials	11.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	12.4%
Energy	8.0%	0.6%
Technology	7.1%	52.1%
Healthcare	5.8%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	0.5%
Utilities	4.4%	0.4%
Communication Services	3.8%	17.8%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

AVDE vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVDE

AVDE Risk / Return Rank: 58
AVDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AVDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
AVDE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
AVDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AVDE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 47
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVDE vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVDE	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.52	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.06	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.27	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	1.80	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.00	6.86	+2.13

AVDE vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDE and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVDE vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDE drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDE and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVDE	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.99%	-24.40%	-12.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-15.44%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.46%	-24.40%	+10.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-5.67%	+4.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-3.27%	-2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	4.04%	-1.10%

Volatility

AVDE vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE) is 5.57%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that AVDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVDE	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	7.09%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	14.83%	-2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.06%	18.25%	-3.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.39%	21.20%	-4.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.93%	21.20%	-2.27%

AVDE vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVDE vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

AVDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF	3.84%	2.66%	3.29%	3.01%	2.79%	2.46%	1.63%	0.29%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.08%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVDE and QGRW in my portfolio?

AVDE and QGRW have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVDE or QGRW?

QGRW has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to AVDE (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDE dropped -36.99% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, AVDE or QGRW?

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 26.27% vs 19.56% for AVDE. On fees, AVDE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AVDE has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVDE or QGRW?

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 26.27% return vs 19.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVDE or QGRW?

AVDE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVDE or QGRW?

AVDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

What is the main difference between AVDE and QGRW?

AVDE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for AVDE and 0.28% for QGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.