AUSF vs. SNPD

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) and SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index while SNPD tracks the S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AUSF returned 19.32%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for SNPD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AUSF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SNPD.

Performance

AUSF vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than SNPD's 13.72% return.

AUSF

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: 6.93%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 1Y: 14.34%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 14.15%
• 10Y*: —

SNPD

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 10.17%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 9.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUSF vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	10.04%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.40%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	13.72%	6.66%	5.41%	2.68%	3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AUSF and SNPD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022	0.86

The correlation between AUSF and SNPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

AUSF vs. SNPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AUSF	SNPD
Financial Services	18.4%	8.0%
Technology	15.3%	7.3%
Industrials	14.4%	16.9%
Healthcare	11.4%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	9.2%
Communication Services	8.6%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.8%	18.8%
Real Estate	4.6%	6.8%
Utilities	4.4%	14.3%
Energy	3.2%	3.1%
Basic Materials	2.6%	7.2%

Return for Risk

AUSF vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 52
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 47
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 51

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 49
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSF vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUSF	SNPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.44	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.17	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	1.85	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.99	5.50	+1.49

AUSF vs. SNPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the SNPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSF and SNPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AUSF vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and SNPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUSF	SNPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.25%	-15.80%	-28.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.84%	-8.68%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-15.80%	+3.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.39%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.18%	-3.86%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.92%	-0.86%

Volatility

AUSF vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUSF	SNPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	3.61%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.10%	8.29%	-1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.35%	11.15%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.62%	13.10%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.99%	13.10%	+5.89%

AUSF vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AUSF vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison

AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than SNPD's 3.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.67%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.19%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUSF and SNPD in my portfolio?

AUSF and SNPD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUSF or SNPD?

AUSF has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to SNPD (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs SNPD's -15.80%.

Which ETF is better, AUSF or SNPD?

On 3-year performance, AUSF leads with 19.32% vs 9.19% for SNPD. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AUSF or SNPD?

Over the 3-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 19.32% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUSF or SNPD?

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUSF or SNPD?

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 2.67% for AUSF.

What is the main difference between AUSF and SNPD?

AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.15% for SNPD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.