AUSF vs. SCHD
AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AUSF returned 12.71%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AUSF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
AUSF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
AUSF
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
AUSF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 6.72% | 13.69% | 16.05% | 22.26% | -0.18% | 27.48% | 1.27% | 24.06% | -10.79% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUSF and SCHD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between AUSF and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
AUSF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AUSF
SCHD
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Financial Services
AUSF
SCHD
Technology
AUSF
SCHD
Healthcare
AUSF
SCHD
Industrials
AUSF
SCHD
Communication Services
AUSF
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
AUSF
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
AUSF
SCHD
Energy
AUSF
SCHD
Real Estate
AUSF
SCHD
-
Utilities
AUSF
SCHD
Basic Materials
AUSF
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUSF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
AUSF
SCHD
AUSF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUSF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.45 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 5.91 | -3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 14.53 | -6.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUSF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.49 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.58 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.86 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
AUSF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUSF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -33.37% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | -4.61% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -16.13% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.23% | -16.85% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -1.40% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -3.32% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.88% | +0.13% |
Volatility
AUSF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 2.41%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUSF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 2.66% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | 7.66% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 10.96% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 14.38% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 16.72% | +2.35% |
AUSF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AUSF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.76% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUSF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.76% for AUSF.
AUSF is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUSF and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer