PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUSF vs. NIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AUSF vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AUSF vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
4.93%13.69%2.64%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
4.31%4.94%4.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly higher than NIXT's 4.31% return.


AUSF

1D
1.17%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
4.93%
6M
5.58%
1Y
14.03%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*

NIXT

1D
3.90%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
4.31%
6M
6.14%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AUSF vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

AUSF vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSF vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUSFNIXTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

0.80

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.28

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.04

4.64

+1.39

AUSF vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSF Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSF and NIXT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUSFNIXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.80

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.39

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between AUSF and NIXT is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AUSF vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than NIXT's 1.53% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.71%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.53%1.64%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AUSF vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than NIXT's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and NIXT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AUSFNIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

-27.75%

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-15.77%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.90%

-4.07%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-6.43%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

4.36%

-1.85%

Volatility

AUSF vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 3.22%, while Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AUSFNIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

7.53%

-4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

15.56%

-8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.41%

26.04%

-11.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

23.78%

-10.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

23.78%

-4.53%