AUSF vs. NIXT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) and NIXT (Research Affiliates Deletions ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index while NIXT tracks the Research Affiliates Deletions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AUSF returned 15.11% vs 33.50% for NIXT. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUSF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for NIXT.

Performance

AUSF vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than NIXT's 18.29% return.

AUSF

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 15.11%
• 3Y*: 20.14%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

NIXT

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 18.29%
• 6M: 17.24%
• 1Y: 33.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUSF vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	6.72%	13.69%	2.64%
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF	18.29%	4.94%	4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AUSF and NIXT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	0.73

The correlation between AUSF and NIXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AUSF vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 44
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

NIXT

NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 50
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 41
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSF vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AUSF	NIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.59	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.34	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	2.87	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.54	9.69	-2.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AUSF vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSF and NIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AUSF	NIXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	1.59	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.71	-0.07

Drawdowns

AUSF vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than NIXT's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and NIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUSF	NIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.25%	-27.75%	-16.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.84%	-11.71%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.26%	-2.37%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-5.96%	+1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	3.47%	-1.46%

Volatility

AUSF vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 2.41%, while Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUSF	NIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.41%	5.00%	-2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.65%	14.08%	-7.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.14%	21.24%	-11.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.65%	23.31%	-9.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.07%	23.31%	-4.24%

AUSF vs. NIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than NIXT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AUSF vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than NIXT's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.76%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF	1.35%	1.64%	1.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUSF and NIXT in my portfolio?

AUSF and NIXT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUSF or NIXT?

NIXT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs NIXT's -27.75%.

Which ETF is better, AUSF or NIXT?

On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 33.50% vs 15.11% for AUSF. On fees, NIXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AUSF or NIXT?

Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 33.50% return vs 15.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUSF or NIXT?

NIXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUSF or NIXT?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.35% for NIXT.

What is the main difference between AUSF and NIXT?

AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Research Affiliates. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.09% for NIXT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NIXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.