AUSF vs. HAPI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) and HAPI (Harbor Corporate Culture ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while HAPI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CIBC Human Capital Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AUSF returned 19.13%/yr vs 19.71%/yr for HAPI. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AUSF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HAPI.

Performance

AUSF vs. HAPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than HAPI's 9.76% return.

AUSF

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 3.29%
• 6M: 7.58%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 19.13%
• 5Y*: 14.47%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.70%

HAPI

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 1.36%
• 6M: 8.44%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 1Y: 18.78%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	$2.36M	$2.26M	$3.95M
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	$76.70K	$60.15K	$72.78K

AUSF vs. HAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	12.60%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	8.26%
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	9.76%	16.26%	27.62%	30.29%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AUSF and HAPI is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.64

The correlation between AUSF and HAPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AUSF vs. HAPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AUSF	HAPI
Financial Services	20.1%	11.8%
Technology	15.7%	32.5%
Industrials	13.4%	9.5%
Healthcare	12.3%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	5.9%
Communication Services	6.6%	14.5%
Utilities	4.5%	2.0%
Real Estate	4.3%	1.5%
Energy	3.3%	2.9%
Basic Materials	2.5%	1.6%

Return for Risk

AUSF vs. HAPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 80
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

HAPI

HAPI Risk / Return Rank: 63
HAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
HAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
HAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
HAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
HAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AUSF vs. HAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUSF	HAPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.45	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.09	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.25	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	2.16	+1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.56	8.85	+0.71

AUSF vs. HAPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the HAPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSF and HAPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AUSF vs. HAPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than HAPI's maximum drawdown of -19.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and HAPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUSF	HAPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.25%	-19.46%	-24.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.84%	-8.12%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-19.46%	+7.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-0.03%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-2.00%	-2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.98%	+0.01%

Volatility

AUSF vs. HAPI - Volatility Comparison

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) at 3.19%. This indicates that AUSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUSF	HAPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	3.19%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.46%	9.34%	-1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.46%	12.10%	-1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.62%	15.62%	-2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.96%	15.62%	+3.34%

AUSF vs. HAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than HAPI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

AUSF vs. HAPI - Dividend Comparison

AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than HAPI's 0.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.61%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	0.79%	0.87%	0.21%	1.21%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUSF and HAPI in my portfolio?

AUSF and HAPI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUSF or HAPI?

AUSF has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to HAPI (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs HAPI's -19.46%.

Which ETF is better, AUSF or HAPI?

On 3-year performance, HAPI leads with 19.71% vs 19.13% for AUSF. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, HAPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AUSF or HAPI?

Over the 3-year period, HAPI has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 19.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUSF or HAPI?

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HAPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUSF or HAPI?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.79% for HAPI.

What is the main difference between AUSF and HAPI?

AUSF is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while HAPI is Large Cap Blend Equities. AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while HAPI tracks CIBC Human Capital Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.35% for HAPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.