AUMI vs. SKF
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF).
AUMI and SKF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. SKF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. Both AUMI and SKF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AUMI vs. SKF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUMI vs. SKF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 10.53% | 164.18% | 30.61% | 4.25% |
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 21.76% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -2.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUMI achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than SKF's 21.76% return.
AUMI
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -16.46%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 26.21%
- 1Y
- 116.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SKF
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 21.76%
- 6M
- 16.27%
- 1Y
- -1.91%
- 3Y*
- -23.89%
- 5Y*
- -17.64%
- 10Y*
- -26.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUMI vs. SKF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SKF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AUMI vs. SKF — Risk / Return Rank
AUMI
SKF
AUMI vs. SKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUMI | SKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.35 | -0.05 | +2.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 0.22 | +2.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.03 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | -0.04 | +3.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | -0.05 | +12.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUMI | SKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | -0.05 | +2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.01 | -0.50 | +2.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUMI and SKF is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
AUMI vs. SKF - Dividend Comparison
AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than SKF's 3.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 0.78% | 0.86% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 3.88% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% |
Drawdowns
AUMI vs. SKF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, smaller than the maximum SKF drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and SKF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUMI | SKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -99.96% | +68.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.88% | -39.47% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.84% | -99.95% | +83.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -89.17% | +83.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.03% | 29.27% | -20.24% |
Volatility
AUMI vs. SKF - Volatility Comparison
Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a higher volatility of 18.77% compared to ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) at 9.64%. This indicates that AUMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUMI | SKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.77% | 9.64% | +9.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.65% | 22.75% | +17.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.65% | 38.59% | +11.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.38% | 36.04% | +5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.38% | 40.94% | +0.44% |