AUMI vs. SILJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ).
AUMI and SILJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUMI is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. SILJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Junior Silver Miners & Explorers Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2012. Both AUMI and SILJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AUMI vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUMI vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 5.10% | 164.18% | 30.61% | 4.25% |
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF | 7.41% | 183.89% | 6.39% | 3.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUMI achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 7.41% return.
AUMI
- 1D
- 7.44%
- 1M
- -20.93%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 21.83%
- 1Y
- 106.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILJ
- 1D
- 8.82%
- 1M
- -26.25%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 31.14%
- 1Y
- 149.83%
- 3Y*
- 42.89%
- 5Y*
- 16.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUMI vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AUMI vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
AUMI
SILJ
AUMI vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUMI | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 2.74 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 2.83 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 4.26 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 14.55 | -2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUMI | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.74 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.92 | 0.09 | +1.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUMI and SILJ is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AUMI vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than SILJ's 1.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 0.82% | 0.86% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.86% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
AUMI vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and SILJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUMI | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -79.04% | +47.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.88% | -34.71% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.93% | -26.25% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -41.67% | +35.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.97% | 10.16% | -1.19% |
Volatility
AUMI vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) is 19.60%, while ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 21.63%. This indicates that AUMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUMI | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.60% | 21.63% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.36% | 46.79% | -6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.41% | 54.97% | -5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.29% | 44.07% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.29% | 46.61% | -5.32% |