PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUMI vs. IAUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUMI vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUMI achieves a -13.29% return, which is significantly lower than IAUI's -5.63% return.


AUMI

1D
-4.42%
1M
-8.75%
YTD
-13.29%
6M
-17.30%
1Y
42.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IAUI

1D
-2.15%
1M
-8.06%
YTD
-5.63%
6M
-8.22%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUMI vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
-13.29%57.37%
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
-5.63%20.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AUMI and IAUI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.78

The correlation between AUMI and IAUI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUMI vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUMI
AUMI Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
AUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUI
IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUMI vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AUMIIAUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

0.63

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.97

1.87

+1.10

AUMI vs. IAUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the IAUI Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUMI and IAUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AUMI vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -39.28%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -20.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and IAUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUMIIAUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.28%

-20.43%

-18.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.28%

-20.43%

-18.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.76%

-19.97%

-14.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-4.13%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.30%

6.86%

+7.44%

Volatility

AUMI vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison

Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a higher volatility of 18.19% compared to NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) at 7.78%. This indicates that AUMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUMIIAUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.19%

7.78%

+10.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.34%

19.82%

+21.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.13%

21.42%

+28.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.46%

21.06%

+21.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.46%

21.06%

+21.40%

AUMI vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUMI vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison

AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than IAUI's 14.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AUMI
Themes Gold Miners ETF
1.00%0.86%1.84%
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
14.80%6.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUMI and IAUI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AUMI has higher volatility (18.19%) compared to IAUI (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUMI dropped -39.28% vs IAUI's -20.43%.

On 1-year performance, AUMI leads with 42.36% vs 12.83% for IAUI. On fees, AUMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IAUI has been the lower-risk option at 7.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AUMI has performed better with a 42.36% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 14.80%, compared with 1.00% for AUMI.

AUMI is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUMI and 0.78% for IAUI.

AUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUMI and IAUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer