AUMI vs. IAUI
AUMI (Themes Gold Miners ETF) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUMI is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. AUMI is passively managed, while IAUI is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.
Performance
AUMI vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUMI achieves a -5.96% return, which is significantly lower than IAUI's 1.64% return.
AUMI
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- -5.96%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 48.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUI
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUMI vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | -5.96% | 59.81% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 1.64% | 20.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUMI and IAUI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUMI vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank
AUMI
IAUI
AUMI vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUMI | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUMI | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 1.13 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
AUMI vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -16.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and IAUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUMI | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -16.88% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.25% | -13.80% | -15.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -3.45% | -3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.46% | — | — |
Volatility
AUMI vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUMI | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.95% | 20.31% | +27.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.57% | 20.31% | +21.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.57% | 20.31% | +21.26% |
AUMI vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUMI vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison
AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than IAUI's 12.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.84% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 12.65% | 6.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUMI and IAUI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.
IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 12.65%, compared with 0.92% for AUMI.
AUMI is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUMI and 0.78% for IAUI.
Find the right allocation for AUMI and IAUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer