AUMI vs. IAUI
AUMI (Themes Gold Miners ETF) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUMI is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. AUMI is passively managed, while IAUI is actively managed. Over the past year, AUMI returned 42.36% vs 12.83% for IAUI. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.
Performance
AUMI vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUMI achieves a -13.29% return, which is significantly lower than IAUI's -5.63% return.
AUMI
- 1D
- -4.42%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- -13.29%
- 6M
- -17.30%
- 1Y
- 42.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUI
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -5.63%
- 6M
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUMI vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | -13.29% | 57.37% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | -5.63% | 20.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUMI and IAUI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between AUMI and IAUI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUMI vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank
AUMI
IAUI
AUMI vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUMI | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.13 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.63 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 1.87 | +1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUMI vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUMI drawdown since its inception was -39.28%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -20.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMI and IAUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUMI | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.28% | -20.43% | -18.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.28% | -20.43% | -18.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.76% | -19.97% | -14.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -4.13% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.30% | 6.86% | +7.44% |
Volatility
AUMI vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison
Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) has a higher volatility of 18.19% compared to NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) at 7.78%. This indicates that AUMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUMI | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.19% | 7.78% | +10.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.34% | 19.82% | +21.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.13% | 21.42% | +28.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.46% | 21.06% | +21.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.46% | 21.06% | +21.40% |
AUMI vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUMI vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison
AUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than IAUI's 14.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AUMI Themes Gold Miners ETF | 1.00% | 0.86% | 1.84% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 14.80% | 6.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUMI and IAUI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AUMI has higher volatility (18.19%) compared to IAUI (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUMI dropped -39.28% vs IAUI's -20.43%.
On 1-year performance, AUMI leads with 42.36% vs 12.83% for IAUI. On fees, AUMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IAUI has been the lower-risk option at 7.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AUMI has performed better with a 42.36% return vs 12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.
IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 14.80%, compared with 1.00% for AUMI.
AUMI is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUMI and 0.78% for IAUI.
AUMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUMI and IAUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer