AUCO.L vs. BAB.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

AUCO.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) is Gold fund tracking the STOXX Global Gold Miners Index, while BAB.L (Babcock International Group plc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AUCO.L returned 14.35%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for BAB.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AUCO.L vs. BAB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AUCO.L is traded in USD, while BAB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BAB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUCO.L achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly higher than BAB.L's -17.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AUCO.L has outperformed BAB.L with an annualized return of 14.35%, while BAB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.44% annualized return.

AUCO.L

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -16.15%
• YTD: -8.56%
• 6M: -1.88%
• 1Y: 54.19%
• 3Y*: 46.28%
• 5Y*: 20.71%
• 10Y*: 14.35%

BAB.L

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -3.48%
• YTD: -17.23%
• 6M: -11.63%
• 1Y: -2.50%
• 3Y*: 52.45%
• 5Y*: 27.56%
• 10Y*: 1.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUCO.L vs. BAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF	-8.56%	181.83%	17.96%	15.02%	-14.30%	-10.12%	21.72%	44.14%	-10.42%	10.00%
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc	-17.23%	168.92%	25.85%	47.98%	-20.89%	12.79%	-54.17%	42.49%	-31.86%	-16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AUCO.L and BAB.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2008	0.16

The correlation between AUCO.L and BAB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (10 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AUCO.L vs. BAB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUCO.L

AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

BAB.L

BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUCO.L vs. BAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AUCO.L	BAB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	-0.07	+1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	0.16	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.02	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	-0.06	+1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	-0.16	+4.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AUCO.L vs. BAB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the BAB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUCO.L and BAB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AUCO.L	BAB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	-0.07	+1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.78	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.04	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.14	+0.06

Drawdowns

AUCO.L vs. BAB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUCO.L drawdown since its inception was -78.30%, smaller than the maximum BAB.L drawdown of -84.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCO.L and BAB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUCO.L	BAB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.30%	-84.09%	+5.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.80%	-38.37%	+6.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.80%	-38.37%	+6.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.62%	-41.84%	-6.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.47%	-78.82%	+24.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.80%	-33.06%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.79%	-37.72%	-3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.15%	15.30%	-3.15%

Volatility

AUCO.L vs. BAB.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) at 12.48%. This indicates that AUCO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUCO.L	BAB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.14%	12.48%	+2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.64%	27.12%	+9.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.89%	36.34%	+9.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.20%	35.48%	+2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.40%	38.85%	-3.45%

Dividends

AUCO.L vs. BAB.L - Dividend Comparison

AUCO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc	0.67%	0.56%	1.06%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.78%	6.08%	4.04%	2.75%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUCO.L and BAB.L in my portfolio?

AUCO.L and BAB.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.