AUCO.L vs. LDGL.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L).

AUCO.L and LDGL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUCO.L is a passively managed fund by L&G that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2008. LDGL.L is a passively managed fund by L&G that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. It was launched on Nov 18, 2025. Both AUCO.L and LDGL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AUCO.L vs. LDGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AUCO.L vs. LDGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF	0.35%
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing	3.01%

Returns By Period

AUCO.L

• 1D: 7.53%
• 1M: -14.77%
• YTD: 12.17%
• 6M: 28.13%
• 1Y: 117.52%
• 3Y*: 55.66%
• 5Y*: 28.66%
• 10Y*: 19.80%

LDGL.L

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -4.33%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUCO.L vs. LDGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUCO.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LDGL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.

AUCO.L

L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF

LDGL.L

L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing

Return for Risk

AUCO.L vs. LDGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUCO.L

AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUCO.L vs. LDGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AUCO.L	LDGL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.97	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AUCO.L	LDGL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.91	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between AUCO.L and LDGL.L is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AUCO.L vs. LDGL.L - Dividend Comparison

AUCO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.

	TTM
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF	0.00%
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.68%

Drawdowns

AUCO.L vs. LDGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUCO.L drawdown since its inception was -78.40%, which is greater than LDGL.L's maximum drawdown of -10.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCO.L and LDGL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUCO.L	LDGL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.40%	-10.00%	-68.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.34%	-5.96%	-10.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.76%	-3.08%	-39.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AUCO.L	LDGL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.79%	16.52%	+30.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.53%	16.52%	+21.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.37%	16.52%	+18.85%