AUAU vs. URA
AUAU (Global X Gold Miners ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUAU is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUAU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
AUAU vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a -15.85% return, which is significantly lower than URA's -8.47% return.
AUAU
- 1D
- -3.66%
- 1M
- -17.98%
- 6M
- -25.47%
- YTD
- -15.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -18.30%
- 6M
- -25.90%
- YTD
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.86%
- 5Y*
- 19.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
AUAU vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | -15.85% | 4.18% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | -8.47% | -6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUAU and URA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUAU vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
AUAU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
URA
AUAU vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUAU | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUAU vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUAU | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.84% | -93.54% | +55.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.84% | -55.62% | +17.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.39% | -74.80% | +58.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.55% | — |
Volatility
AUAU vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUAU | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.04% | 51.62% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.04% | 44.03% | +7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.04% | 38.00% | +13.04% |
AUAU vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUAU vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
AUAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than URA's 5.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 5.33% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUAU and URA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUAU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUAU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 0.74% for AUAU.
AUAU is categorized as Gold, while URA is Uranium. AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 0.69% for URA.
Find the right allocation for AUAU and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer