PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUAU vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUAU vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return.


AUAU

1D
-3.14%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
0.16%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUAU vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AUAU
Global X Gold Miners ETF
0.16%4.18%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AUAU and GDX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUAU vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUAU

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUAU vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AUAU vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUAUGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.13

+0.06

Drawdowns

AUAU vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -30.38%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUAUGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.38%

-80.34%

+49.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.02%

-26.62%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.64%

-40.43%

+27.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.99%

Volatility

AUAU vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUAUGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.87%

45.49%

+5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.87%

36.39%

+14.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.87%

37.18%

+13.69%

AUAU vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUAU vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

AUAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUAU
Global X Gold Miners ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, AUAU and GDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AUAU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUAU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for AUAU.

AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 0.51% for GDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUAU and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer