AUAU vs. GDX
AUAU (Global X Gold Miners ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds - AUAU tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index while GDX tracks the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AUAU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
AUAU vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a -15.85% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -16.75% return.
AUAU
- 1D
- -3.66%
- 1M
- -17.98%
- 6M
- -25.47%
- YTD
- -15.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDX
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- -18.16%
- 6M
- -26.48%
- YTD
- -16.75%
- 1Y
- 38.79%
- 3Y*
- 32.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
AUAU vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | -15.85% | 4.18% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -16.75% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUAU and GDX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUAU vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
AUAU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDX
AUAU vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUAU | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUAU vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUAU | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.84% | -80.34% | +42.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.84% | -38.36% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.39% | -40.38% | +23.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.35% | — |
Volatility
AUAU vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUAU | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.04% | 48.15% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.04% | 37.09% | +13.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.04% | 37.37% | +13.67% |
AUAU vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUAU vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
AUAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than GDX's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.89% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, AUAU and GDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AUAU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUAU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.74% for AUAU.
AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 0.51% for GDX.
Find the right allocation for AUAU and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer