AUAU vs. SIL
AUAU (Global X Gold Miners ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUAU is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AUAU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
AUAU vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's -7.70% return.
AUAU
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -11.09%
- 6M
- -14.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIL
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -15.59%
- YTD
- -7.70%
- 6M
- -11.12%
- 1Y
- 64.52%
- 3Y*
- 45.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
AUAU vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | -11.09% | 4.18% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -7.70% | 7.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUAU and SIL is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUAU vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
AUAU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIL
AUAU vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUAU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUAU vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUAU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.86% | -82.99% | +47.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.32% | -34.69% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -51.36% | +36.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.91% | — |
Volatility
AUAU vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUAU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 44.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.21% | 52.72% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.21% | 39.88% | +12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.21% | 39.91% | +12.30% |
AUAU vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUAU vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
AUAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.28% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, AUAU and SIL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AUAU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUAU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for AUAU.
AUAU is categorized as Gold, while SIL is Silver. AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 0.65% for SIL.
Find the right allocation for AUAU and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer