PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUAU vs. SIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUAU vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's -7.70% return.


AUAU

1D
1.41%
1M
-14.50%
YTD
-11.09%
6M
-14.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIL

1D
2.01%
1M
-15.59%
YTD
-7.70%
6M
-11.12%
1Y
64.52%
3Y*
45.56%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUAU vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AUAU
Global X Gold Miners ETF
-11.09%4.18%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
-7.70%7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AUAU and SIL is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUAU vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUAU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUAU vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AUAUSILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.34

AUAU vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AUAU vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and SIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUAUSILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.86%

-82.99%

+47.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.32%

-34.69%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.51%

-51.36%

+36.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.91%

Volatility

AUAU vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUAUSILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.21%

52.72%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.21%

39.88%

+12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.21%

39.91%

+12.30%

AUAU vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUAU vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

AUAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUAU
Global X Gold Miners ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.28%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, AUAU and SIL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AUAU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUAU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for AUAU.

AUAU is categorized as Gold, while SIL is Silver. AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 0.65% for SIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUAU and SIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer