AUAU vs. BOTZ
AUAU (Global X Gold Miners ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUAU is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AUAU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
AUAU vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUAU achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 4.83% return.
AUAU
- 1D
- -8.34%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- —
AUAU vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | -6.86% | 4.18% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 4.83% | -1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUAU and BOTZ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUAU vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
AUAU
BOTZ
AUAU vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Miners ETF (AUAU) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUAU | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.42 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
AUAU vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUAU drawdown since its inception was -31.20%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAU and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUAU | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.20% | -55.54% | +24.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.20% | -8.77% | -22.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.89% | -18.31% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.66% | — |
Volatility
AUAU vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUAU | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.93% | 24.56% | +27.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.93% | 26.82% | +25.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.93% | 25.77% | +26.16% |
AUAU vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUAU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUAU vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
AUAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUAU Global X Gold Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUAU and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUAU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUAU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for AUAU.
AUAU is categorized as Gold, while BOTZ is Robotics. AUAU tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AUAU and 0.68% for BOTZ.
Find the right allocation for AUAU and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer